MidFirst Bank v. Jenkins et al
| MidFirst Bank |
| Vicki Lynn Jenkins, Christi Lea Reasoner, Curtis Scott Hudson, Kelly Dee Key and Kelli Dee Key |
| 4:2021cv00907 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Real Property: All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
FINAL JUDGMENT: This is a final judgment that fully and finally resolves all remaining parties and claims to this suit and may be appealed. All relief not granted herein is denied. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/23/2021) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Before the Court is the Motion for Entry of Agreed Final Judgment (ECF No. #10 ), filed August 23, 2021. Plaintiff MidFirst Bank and Defendants Vicki Lynn Jenkins, Christi Lea Reasoner, Curtis Scott Hudson, and Kelli Dee Key have announced to the Court that they desire to resolve all matters in controversy between them. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/23/2021) (mmw)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Agreed Default Judgment, filed by MidFirst Bank (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Curtis Scott Hudson ; served on 8/2/2021. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Vicki Lynn Jenkins ; served on 8/2/2021. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Christi Lea Reasoner ; served on 7/31/2021. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Kelly Dee Key ; served on 8/3/2021. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Curtis Scott Hudson, Vicki Lynn Jenkins, Kelly Dee Key, Christi Lea Reasoner. (wxc) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MidFirst Bank. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons as to all Defendants filed by MidFirst Bank. (Cronenwett, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by MidFirst Bank. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12095228) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet) (Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
