Lee v. 20/20 Communications Inc et al
| Wilfred L. Lee, Jr. and Wilfred L Lee, Jr |
| 20/20 Communications, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sara Wali, 20/20 Communications Inc, Best Buy Co Inc and Samsung Electronics America Inc |
| 4:2021cv00923 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Terry R Means |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s), #3 Additional Page(s), #4 Additional Page(s)) (Lee, Wilfred) |
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE: It is therefore ORDERED that the clerk of Court is directed to send blank summons forms with a copy of this order to Plaintiff. It is further ORDERED that this action should be returned to the United States District Judge for such other action as may be deemed appropriate. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 8/12/2021) (Attachments: #1 Summons) (pef)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Wilfred L Lee, Jr must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has not paid the filing and administrative fees nor has he filed a long-form application to proceed in forma pauperis. In order for the Court to make the determination regarding any pauper application, Plaintiff must provide complete and accurate answers to all of the questions in the long-form in-forma-pauperis application, including information about assets and expenses, any spouse's income, and whether the applicant has any dependents. A long-form application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs shall be mailed to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 8/9/2021) (pef)
|
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (pef) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (pef) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Wilfred L. Lee, Jr. (Clerk declines to issue summons; filing fee not paid.) (pef) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wilfred L. Lee, Jr. (pef) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against 20/20 Communications, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sara Wali filed by Wilfred L. Lee, Jr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (pef) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Wed Aug 4 14:18:58 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
