Coker et al v. Andrade et al
| Christopher R. Coker, CRC Holdings LLC and Kyle Richardson |
| Luis G. Andrade, Andrade Holdings LLC and The Luis Andrade Living Trust |
| 4:2021cv01020 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3545 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Luis G. Andrade, Andrade Holdings LLC, The Luis Andrade Living Trust with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Lance H Beshara added to party Luis G. Andrade(pty:dft), Attorney Lance H Beshara added to party Andrade Holdings LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Lance H Beshara added to party The Luis Andrade Living Trust(pty:dft) (Beshara, Lance) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Timothy Beesley on behalf of CRC Holdings LLC, Christopher R. Coker, Kyle Richardson. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Beesley, John) |
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING LOCAL COUNSEL: A review of the record reveals that Plaintiffs are not in compliance with Local Rule 83.10(a). Accordingly, within fourteen days of this order, those Plaintiffs shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or dismissal of this case without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/3/2021) (tln)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Luis G. Andrade, Andrade Holdings LLC, The Luis Andrade Living Trust. (tln) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tln) |
| Filing 3 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint,,,,, by Plaintiffs CRC Holdings LLC, Christopher R. Coker, Kyle Richardson. (Tucker, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CRC Holdings LLC. (Tucker, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Luis Andrade, Andrade Holdings LLC, The Luis Andrade Living Trust filed by Christopher R. Coker, CRC Holdings LLC, Kyle Richardson. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12188526) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1- Letter) (Tucker, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
