Salascio v. Tarrant County Jail et al
| Gabriel Salascio |
| Tarrant County Jail, John Peter Smith Hospital, FNU Dumass, FNU Rice and FNU Campbell |
| 4:2021cv01025 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING POST JUDGMENT MOTION: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to reopen #7 is construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). It is further ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/21/2021) (sre)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue Sep 21 15:28:24 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Gabriel Salascio. (Clerk's Note: Hazardous material included with letter has been confiscated by USMS). (sre) |
|
Filing 6
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order issued this same day and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/7/2021) (sre)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This case is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reopen the case if he pays the $402.00 filing and administrative fees and files a motion to reopen within thirty days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/7/2021) (sre)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Tue Sep 7 16:14:28 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Gabriel Salascio. (sre) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Campbell, FNU Dumass, John Peter Smith Hospital, FNU Rice, Tarrant County Jail filed by Gabriel Salascio. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Fri Sep 3 15:24:16 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
