Sihkhamfong v. LendingHome Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-RTL1
| Somphava Sihkhamfong |
| LendingHome Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-RTL1 |
| ADR Provider |
| 4:2021cv01143 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Non-Compliance with Court Order and Motion for Clarification re: #4 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, filed by LendingHome Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-RTL1 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Opitz, Justin) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning February 6, 2023 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 1/21/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 1/21/2022. Deadline for mediation is on or before 8/10/2022. Discovery due by 9/9/2022. Motions due by 10/10/2022. Pretrial Order due by 1/12/2023. Attorney Chad Berry for ADR Provider added. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/23/2021) (pef)
|
| Filing 5 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by LendingHome Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-RTL1. (Fontein, Addison) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) on or before 11/19/2021, Plaintiff file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigned's judge-specific requirements; and, (2) on or before 12/10/2021, Defendant file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/28/2021) (twd)
|
|
Filing 3
Order for Scheduling Order Proposal: Joint Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order due by 11/12/2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/28/2021) (twd)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (pef) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by LendingHome Funding Mortgage Trust 2020-RTL1. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12293125) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index, #2 Exhibit(s) 1, #3 Exhibit(s) 2, #4 Exhibit(s) 3, #5 Exhibit(s) 4, #6 Exhibit(s) 5, #7 Exhibit(s) 6, #8 Exhibit(s) 7) (Opitz, Justin) Modified docket text on 10/12/2021 (pef). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
