Hollis v. Webber
Plaintiff: Drue Allen Hollis
Defendant: Dennis Andrew Webber
Case Number: 4:2021cv01150
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Referring Judge: Hal R Ray
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT : It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/23/2021) (bdb)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: This Court concludes that this in forma pauperis application should be, and it is hereby, DENIED. The Court ACCEPTS Magistrate Judge Ray's recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. Hollis's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/23/2021) (bdb)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10, 11. Tue Nov 23 16:47:46 CST 2021 (crt)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Copy of Proposed Final Order w/Cover Sheet filed by Drue Allen Hollis. (bdb)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Copy of Proposed Final Order w/Cover Sheet filed by Drue Allen Hollis. (bdb)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Drue Allen Hollis. (bdb)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Document titled Proposed Final Order Cover Sheet with Proposed Final Order of Summary Judgment filed by Drue Allen Hollis. (pef)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The undersigned RECOMMENDS that United States District Judge Mark T. Pittman DISMISS Hollis's #1 Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders. Any party who objects to any part of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation must file specific written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 11/5/2021) (pef)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Nov 5 10:25:26 CDT 2021 (crt)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Drue Allen Hollis must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has neither paid the $402 filing and administrative fee nor filed an Application to Proceed in the District Court without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 10/29/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 10/15/2021) (bdb)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Oct 15 13:57:12 CDT 2021 (crt)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dennis Andrew Webber filed by Drue Allen Hollis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Thu Oct 14 14:18:51 CDT 2021 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hollis v. Webber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Drue Allen Hollis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Andrew Webber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?