Canal Insurance Company v Magallon Trucking, Inc. et al
Canal Insurance Company |
Magallon Trucking, Inc., Saul A. Magallon and Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez |
4:2021cv01170 |
October 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Saul A. Magallon. (sre) |
Filing 19 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Magallon Trucking, Inc. (sre) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Default Judgment against Saul A. Magallon filed by Canal Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Affidavit(s), #3 Proposed Order) (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 17 Request for Clerk to issue ENTRY OF DEFAULT filed by Canal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Default Judgment against Magallon Trucking, Inc. filed by Canal Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 15 Request for Clerk to issue ENTRY OF DEFAULT filed by Canal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 14 ORDER: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to seek entry of default by the Clerk of this Court and to file a motion for default judgment against Defendants Saul A. Magallon and Magallon Trucking, Inc. on or before December 20, 2021. Otherwise, the Court may dismiss Plaintiffs action against these Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P.41(b); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/10/2021) (sre) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Lead counsel for each party (or designee attorney with appropriate authority) and any unrepresented party (except for a prisoner litigant proceeding pro se) shall confer (the "Scheduling Conference") in a face-to-face conference as soon as practicable. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before January 7, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/8/2021) (sre) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Marilyn B Wells. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/8/2021)(chmb)(lcsfs) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez. (Wells, Marilyn) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Wells, Marilyn) |
Filing 9 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12429493) filed by Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez Attorney Marilyn B Wells added to party Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez(pty:dft) (Wells, Marilyn) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez; served on 11/13/2021. (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Magallon Trucking, Inc.; served on 11/5/2021. (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Saul A. Magallon; served on 11/5/2021. (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Saul A. Magallon, Magallon Trucking, Inc., Miguel Ulloa-Rodriguez. (bdb) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: no court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
Filing 3 Payment for #1 Complaint,,,, filed by Stephen A. Melendi. ($402; Receipt number 0539-12324032). (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stephen A. Melendi. (Melendi, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Magallon Trucking, Inc. et al filed by Canal Insurance Company. (Filer fee note- $402; Receipt number 0539-12324032) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Cover Sheet) (Melendi, Stephen) Modified filers and fee information on 10/22/2021 (bdb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.