Farris v. MTC Mgmt and Training Corp et al
| Stephen Farris |
| MTC Mgmt and Training Corp., Caleb Nicholas Sills, Michael Watkins, Gerardo Hernandez, Aaron Brownlee, Driss Moussat, Warden Grady Wallace, AW Assistant Warden, UTMB Medical Staff, Mark Reynolds, Vicki Easter, MTC Official, Officer Tucker, Chaplain Glenn Pierce, MTC Mgmt and Training Corp, S. Ince, MTC, UTMB, United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division and Mr. FNU Rumage |
| 4:2021cv01333 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Parole filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Vicki Easter, S. Ince, MTC Mgmt and Training Corp, Mark Reynolds, UTMB Medical Staff, Grady Wallace, FNU Rumage filed by Stephen Farris. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
| Filing 18 Untitled Document filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Issue Subpoena filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
| Filing 15 General Provisions filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
| Filing 14 Special Pleading filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
Filing 13
ORDER: Plaintiff's #10 Motion for Summary Judgment is nonsensical and difficult to understand. Plaintiff's motion is therefore DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/13/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:13. Thu Jan 13 11:49:32 CST 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is therefore DENIED without prejudice. See Appl., ECF No. #7 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/11/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Tue Jan 11 10:31:44 CST 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 4:21-cv-1336-P consolidated with lead case 4:21-cv-1333-P. Farris shall file a second amended complaint on the form provided by the Court by February 4, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/5/2022) (Attachments: #1 amended 1983) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Wed Jan 5 12:55:12 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Stephen Farris. (Also filed in 4:21-cv-1336-P) (bdb) |
| Filing 9 Supplement to Original Pleading by Stephen Farris as to #6 Amended Complaint. (Also filed in 4:21-cv-1336-P) (bdb) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum and Notice of Amendments filed by Stephen Farris re: #6 Amended Complaint. (Also filed in 4:21-cv-1336-P) (bdb) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Stephen Farris. (bdb) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Vicki Easter, Glenn Pierce, Mark Reynolds, Grady Wallace, S. Ince, MTC, UTMB filed by Stephen Farris. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Review filed by Stephen Farris (mmw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: If Farris intends on pursuing this action, he must (1) either pay the $402.00 filing fee or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) file his complaint on the appropriate form by January 11, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/13/2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP, #2 1983) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Dec 13 14:36:03 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 1 ***STRICKEN per #4 ORDER*** COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Stephen Farris. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) Modified on 12/13/2021 (mmw). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Thu Dec 9 14:32:08 CST 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
