Diaz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Charles Ray Diaz |
| Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 4:2021cv01372 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: It is ORDERED that the #7 motion for extension of time, construed as a motion for extension to pay the filing fee, is GRANTED, such that the time to pay the $5.00 filing fee is extended until 3/16/2022. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of the petition for writ of habeas corpus for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/23/2022) (twd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Wed Feb 23 09:59:06 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 8
Untitled document filed by Charles Ray Diaz (mmw)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response with Brief in Support filed by Charles Ray Diaz (mmw)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/11/2022) (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Jan 11 10:36:50 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Charles Ray Diaz (mmw)
|
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Charles Ray Diaz must address the following deficiency: The $5.00 filing fee for habeas petitions has not been paid nor has an application to proceed in forma pauperis and certificate of inmate trust account been submitted.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/28/2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Dec 28 14:44:07 CST 2021 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw)
|
|
Filing 2
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: STFAM Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Ray Diaz. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Mon Dec 27 12:27:14 CST 2021 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
