Bell v. State of Texas
Ted Bell |
Texas and State of Texas |
4:2022cv00004 |
January 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Terry R Means |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING #9 MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL: In the event that the Court later determines appointment of counsel is required, it will enter an appropriate order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 2/25/2022) (twd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Fri Feb 25 16:03:17 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 9 Motion for Attorney to Take Over filed by Ted Bell (wxc) |
Filing 8 ORDER...after reviewing the petition in conjunction with Bells earlier pleadings, the Court concludes that Bells petition should be construed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 because he challenges the execution of his sentence. Specifically, Bell complains that an outstanding state detainer is impeding his ability to participate in a reentry program. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 2/14/2022) (Attachments: #1 2241 Form) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon Feb 14 14:50:06 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 7 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Ted Bell. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Filing 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Ted Bell (wxc) |
Filing 5 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Ted Bell must address the following deficiency: Petitioner did not file the required $5.00 filing fee or submit a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified statement of his inmate trust account.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 1/6/2022) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. w/ IFP form and 28 U.S.C. 2254 form Thu Jan 6 14:54:47 CST 2022 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Tue Jan 4 17:09:56 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Texas filed by Ted Bell. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.