Hollis v. Webber et al
Drue Allen Hollis |
Dennis Andrew Webber, Valerie Adele Webber, State of Texas, Tarrant County, Texas, City of Fort Worth, Wingate Arts, L.L.C., Kathleen Gallagher Realty and Wingate Arts LLC |
4:2022cv00032 |
January 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Hal R Ray |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT: This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/22/2022) (mmw) |
Filing 11 Order Accepting #10 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #1 Complaint filed by Drue Allen Hollis. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/22/2022) (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11, 12. Tue Feb 22 10:56:07 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 10 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Judge O'Connor DISMISS this action WITH PREJUDICE because Plaintiff Drue Hollis does not state a claim for which relief can be granted and any attempts at amending the Complaint would be futile. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 2/7/2022) (twd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Mon Feb 7 13:22:22 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (cont'd) by Drue Allen Hollis. (mmw) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Drue Allen Hollis (mmw) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis: Service of process shall be withheld pending judicial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 1/18/2022) (twd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Jan 18 10:07:37 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: STFAM. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Drue Allen Hollis. (Not issued pending #2 Motion for IFP) (mmw) Modified on 1/14/2022 (mmw). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Drue Allen Hollis. (mmw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Drue Allen Hollis (mmw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Drue Allen Hollis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Fri Jan 14 14:36:37 CST 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.