Fuhr et al v. Waylett et al
| J.A. Fuhr Family Trust and Jay Fuhr |
| Good 2 Go Inc, Mr. Tyler Waylett, Good 2 Go, Inc and John Does #1-10, 4:22-cv-46-P |
| 4:2022cv00046 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Good 2 Go, Inc ; served on 3/10/2022. (Chavez, Anthony) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Tyler Waylett ; served on 3/10/2022. (Chavez, Anthony) |
Filing 9
ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT #8 Correspondence filed by Tyler Waylett due to the following deficiency: The document must be in proper form. A completed certificate of service is required. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/17/2022) (bdb)
|
| Filing 8 ***UNFILED AND STRICKEN PER #9 ORDER*** (Document Restricted) Sealed Correspondence to the Court filed by Tyler Waylett. (bdb) Modified on 3/17/2022 (bdb). |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Anthony S. Chavez. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g).(Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/15/2022) (chmb) (lbc)
|
| Filing 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12635272) filed by Jay Fuhr, J.A. Fuhr Family Trust (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Chavez, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Good 2 Go, Inc, Tyler Waylett. (Attachments: #1 Waylett) (npk) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Jay Fuhr, J.A. Fuhr Family Trust. (Cuccia, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Jay Fuhr, J.A. Fuhr Family Trust. (Cuccia, Richard) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Jay Fuhr, J.A. Fuhr Family Trust. (Receipt #0539-12532257,$402.00) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits A-J) (Cuccia, Richard) Modified on 1/19/2022 (npk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
