Carter v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Lanell Carter
Defendant: John Doe and Roehl Refrigerated Transport LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00123
Filed: February 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The Court REMANDS this case to the 17th District Court of Tarrant County. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/1/2022) (Attachments: #1 Remand letter) (mmw)
March 31, 2022 Filing 8 First STIPULATION of Damages by Lanell Carter. (Du, Fei)
March 31, 2022 Filing 7 AMENDED ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint,, filed by Roehl Refrigerated Transport LLC Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Cox, Clinton)
March 10, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Doe and Roehl Refrigerated Transport, LLC filed by Lanell Carter. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Capps, Jared) Modified parties against on 3/15/2022 (mmw).
February 24, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Roehl Refrigerated Transport LLC. (Cox, Clinton)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) on or before 3/10/2022, Plaintiff file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigned's judge-specific requirements; and (2) on or before 3/31/2022, Defendant file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. The Court further ORDERS that failure of any party to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims or granting of a default judgment, as appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/17/2022) (twd)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order for Scheduling Order Proposal: Joint Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order shall be filed on or before 3/14/2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/17/2022) (twd)
February 17, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Thu Feb 17 10:50:22 CST 2022 (crt)
February 17, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Thu Feb 17 08:38:23 CST 2022 (crt)
February 16, 2022 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw)
February 16, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Roehl Refrigerated Transport LLC, John Doe. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12605928) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s)) (Cox, Clinton)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lanell Carter
Represented By: Mary Akapo
Represented By: Fei Hwa Du
Represented By: Jared Willie Capps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Clinton V Cox, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roehl Refrigerated Transport LLC
Represented By: Clinton V Cox, IV
Represented By: Gregory R Brenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?