InteliTrac, Inc. v. SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc. et al
InteliTrac, Inc. |
SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc., SITA Information Networking Computing B.V., Societe Internationale de Telecommunications Aeronautiques SCRL and Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board |
4:2022cv00131 |
February 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Property Rights: Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to SITA Information Networking Computing B.V.. Waiver sent on 3/16/2022; SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc.. Waiver sent on 3/16/2022; Societe Internationale de Telecommunications Aeronautiques SCRL. Waiver sent on 3/16/2022. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board. Waiver sent on 3/11/2022. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to SITA Information Networking Computing B.V. and SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc. (mmw) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons to SITA Information Networking Computing B.V and SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc. filed by InteliTrac, Inc.. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 4 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (mmw) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/24/2022) (mmw). |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by InteliTrac, Inc.. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by InteliTrac, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12614852) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Article, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Screenshots of webpage, #3 Exhibit(s) C - 821 Patent, #4 Exhibit(s) D - 610 Patent, #5 Exhibit(s) E - 826 Patent, #6 Exhibit(s) F - 787 Patent, #7 Exhibit(s) G - 577 Patent, #8 Exhibit(s) H - 734 Patent, #9 Exhibit(s) I - 557 Patent, #10 Exhibit(s) J - 076 Patent, #11 Exhibit(s) K - 165 Patent, #12 Exhibit(s) L - 855 Patent, #13 Exhibit(s) M - 158 Patent, #14 Exhibit(s) N - 623 Patent, #15 Exhibit(s) O - 674 Patent, #16 Cover Sheet) (Jackson, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.