Nesby v. All Commercial Floors
| Benita D. Nesby |
| All Commercial Floors |
| 4:2022cv00167 |
| March 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Labor: Labor/Management Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL JUDGMENT: It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/20/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9. Wed Apr 20 09:49:06 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER : Plaintiff has failed to pay the required fees. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/19/2022) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER...Before the Court are Plaintiff Benita Nesbys Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Motion) and United States Magistrate Judge Curetons Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. ECF Nos. #2 , #6 . The Court, having conducted a review for plain error and finding none, ACCEPTS Judge Curetons Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and DENIES the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/6/2022) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Apr 6 15:08:47 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND NOTICE AND ORDER: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's March 7, 2022 motion to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. #2 be DENIED by the district judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until March 22, 2022 to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. It is further ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action, previously referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings, conclusions and recommendation, be and is hereby, RETURNED to the docket of the United States District Judge. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/8/2022) (sre) (Main Document 6 replaced with text searchable doc on 3/9/2022) (ali).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Mar 8 15:06:58 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (sre) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Benita D. Nesby. (sre) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Benita D. Nesby. (sre) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Commercial Floors filed by Benita D. Nesby. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nesby v. All Commercial Floors | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Benita D. Nesby | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: All Commercial Floors | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
