Valasquez v. Dart Transit Company et al
| Stephanie Valasquez |
| Dart Transit Company and Thomas Rashad |
| 4:2022cv00177 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to ("Motion"). ECF No. #7 . Having reviewed the Motion, applicable law, and docket entries, the Court DENIES the Motion. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/6/2022) (sre)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Dart Transit Company, Thomas Rashad (Funderburg, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Stephanie Valasquez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Reilley, Timothy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER...the Court ORDERS that: (1) on or before April 25, 2022, Plaintiff file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigneds judge-specific requirements; and (2) within 14 days after Plaintiff files the amended complaint, but no later than May 9, 2022, Defendants shall file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/11/2022) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER...The Joint Report, which shall be filed on or before May 12, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/11/2022) (wxc)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dart Transit Company, Thomas Rashad. (Scudder, Mark) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Thomas Rashad, Dart Transit Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12656756) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits, #2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Scudder, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
