Patel et al v. State Farm LLoyds et al
| Anil Jay Patel and Dharmisthaben Patel |
| State Farm LLoyds and Michael J Watts |
| 4:2022cv00196 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Letter of Remand and certified copy of #12 Order of Remand and certified copy of public docket sheet mailed to 96th Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, Texas. (bdb) |
Filing 12
ORDER: A review of the record reveals that as of the date of this order, Defendant State Farm Lloyds is not in compliance with Local Rule 83.10(a). It is ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the 96th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/6/2022) (bdb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Within fourteen days of this Order, each of the above-named lawyers shall file an application to proceed pro hac vice or otherwise comply with Local Rule 83.9(a). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/25/2022) (bdb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael David Jack for Jeff Benton on behalf of Anil Jay Patel, Dharmisthaben Patel. (Jack, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT #5 Notice of Attorney Appearance filed by Dharmisthaben Patel, Anil Jay Patel due to the following deficiency: Because 1667 Marble Falls Drive, Frisco, Texas 75036 is located in the Eastern District of Texas, not the Northern District, this filing does not satisfy Local Rule 83.10. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/21/2022) (bdb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Having considered the #6 Motion and this Court's practice of strictly enforcing the Local Rules, the Court concludes that the Motion should be, and is hereby, DENIED. Accordingly, Defendant State Farm Lloyds shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a) on or before April 4, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/21/2022) (bdb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Dispense with Local Counsel Requirement filed by State Farm LLoyds (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cantu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 ***UNFILED AND STRICKEN PER #9 ORDER*** NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael David Jack for Joseph Milensky on behalf of Anil Jay Patel, Dharmisthaben Patel. (Jack, Michael) Modified on 3/21/2022 (bdb). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT #3 Notice of Attorney Appearance filed by Dharmisthaben Patel, Anil Jay Patel due to the following deficiency: Filing does not satisfy Local Rule 83.10. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/18/2022) (bdb)
|
| Filing 3 ***UNFILED AND STRICKEN PER #4 ORDER*** NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael David Jack for Joseph Milensky on behalf of Anil Jay Patel, Dharmisthaben Patel. (Jack, Michael) Modified on 3/18/2022 (bdb). |
| Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm LLoyds. (Cantu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by State Farm LLoyds. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12676742) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement Suppl Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) Index of Documents Filed) (Cantu, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
