Acosta v. Arlington Housing Authority
| Shela B. Acosta |
| Arlington Housing Authority |
| 4:2022cv00233 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Shela B. Acosta, no later than June 7, 2022, file a Complaint that meets the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 8(a), and the Court's Local Rules. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/24/2022) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/24/2022) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT: A Motion for the Appointment of Counsel #7 has been filed by Plaintiff and is considered deficient in the areas noted below: The document must be in proper form. Plaintiff, prose, filed the instant document [doe. 7] on May 19, 2022. Plaintiff filed a duplicative motion the same day. Plaintiff is directed to comply with both the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/24/2022) (mmw)
|
| Filing 8 Emergency MOTION to Appoint Counsel /Court-appointed and filed by Shela B. Acosta (Acosta, Shela) Modified on 5/24/2022 (mmw). |
| Filing 7 ***STRICKEN and UNFILED per [9} ORDER*** ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by Shela B. Acosta. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Acosta, Shela) Modified on 5/24/2022 (mmw). |
|
Filing 6
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Shela B. Acosta must address the following deficiency: A civil cover sheet must be filed with the complaint. The document(s) must be in proper form. A completed certificate of service is required. Plaintiff, pro se, filed the instant document on March 28, 2022. Plaintiff is directed to comply with both the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically LR 3.2. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/11/2022) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AUTHORIZING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED No summons shall issue unless authorized by further order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/30/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Mar 30 15:07:18 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Tue Mar 29 12:55:02 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shela B. Acosta (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arlington Housing Authority filed by Shela B. Acosta. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Acosta v. Arlington Housing Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shela B. Acosta | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arlington Housing Authority | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
