Brewer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Alvin O. Brewer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 4:2022cv00238
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Referring Judge: Hal R Ray
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security ; served on 5/6/2022. (wxc)
April 29, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Attorney General of the United States on 4/20/2022. (sre)
April 13, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security ; AUSA served on 4/8/2022. (mmw)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL #4 ...Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Designation of Local Counsel (Local Rule 83.10) and Memorandum in Support, both filed on March 31, 2022. ECF Nos. #4 and #5 . After considering the Motion and Memorandum and noting Howard D. Olinskys membership in the Bar of the Northern District of Texas, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that Mr. Olinsky may represent Plaintiff without designating local counsel, subject to further order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 4/4/2022) (wxc)
April 4, 2022 Filing 8 Summons issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Placed in USMS box for service w/ #1 , #7 ) (Attachments: #1 USM 285, #2 USM 285, #3 USM 285) (wxc)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 ...Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed on March 31, 2022. ECF No. #2 . After reviewing the pleading, attachments, and applicable legal authorities, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 4/4/2022) (wxc)
March 31, 2022 Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (wxc)
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Alvin O. Brewer re #4 MOTION Waive Local Counsel (Olinsky, Howard)
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION Waive Local Counsel filed by Alvin O. Brewer (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Olinsky, Howard)
March 31, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Alvin O. Brewer. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Olinsky, Howard)
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alvin O. Brewer (Olinsky, Howard)
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Alvin O. Brewer. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) if the motion to proceed IFP is granted. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk) (Olinsky, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brewer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alvin O. Brewer
Represented By: Howard D Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?