Jones v. Tarrant County College District
| Kyle Damond Jones |
| Tarrant County College District, Carol Bracken, Eugene Giovannini, Peter Fiannaca, Angela Shindoll and TCCD |
| 4:2022cv00281 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Carol Bracken, Eugene Giovannini, Peter Fiannaca, Angela Shindoll, TCCD filed by Kyle Damond Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FORM AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Kyle Damond Jones, no later than June 7, 2022, shall file a fully completed amended complaint form with any attachment pages, in accordance with the terms of this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/10/2022) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue May 10 12:58:39 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER AUTHORIZING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. No summons shall issue unless authorized by fu1ther order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 4/11/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Apr 11 16:16:42 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kyle Damond Jones. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mmw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kyle Damond Jones (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tarrant County College District filed by Kyle Damond Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Fri Apr 8 13:33:04 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
