Scott v. The Pro. Moray of the City of Fort Worth, TX
| Charles E. Scott and Charles E Scott |
| The Pro. Moray of the City of Fort Worth, TX |
| 4:2022cv00327 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail returned as undeliverable. #8 Judgment, #7 Order of Dismissal or Administrative Closure,, received back from Charles E. Scott as Return to Sender-Unclaimed-Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (wxc) |
| Filing 9 Mail returned as undeliverable. #5 Order And Notice of Deficiency,, received back from Charles E. SCott as Return to Sender-Unclaimed-Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (wxc) |
Filing 8
FINAL JUDGMENT: This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. In accordance with the Order dismissing the case issued on April 28, 2022: It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transmit a true copy of this Final Judgment to the Parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/28/2022) (sre)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Upon review of the docket, the Court concludes that this dispute is duplicative of case number 4:22-cv-0326, styled Charles E. Scott v. Moray of the City Frowther et al. In the interest of judicial efficiency and to avoid redundancy, the Court will proceed with case number 4:22-cv-0327 and will close this case. Pursuant to the Court's inherent authority to manage its docket, this case is accordingly DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/28/2022) (sre)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Thu Apr 28 11:31:53 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION titled, "I'm Asking My Lawyer Whatever the Court Grant to Me" filed by Charles E. Scott. (sre) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Apr 19 09:06:50 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Charles E. Scott must address the following deficiency: Althought plaintiff filed a long form application to proceed in forma pauperis, he did not complete any of the sections of the form related to a spouse or a spouse's income, and he did not complete most of the other sections of the in forma pauperis application. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 5/3/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 4/18/2022) (sre)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (sre) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles E. Scott. (sre) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Pro. Moray of the City of Fort Worth, TX filed by Charles E. Scott. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Mon Apr 18 12:41:46 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
