General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Gresham et al
| General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists |
| Joe Gresham, Linda Trice, Sterling Trice, Gay Mathis, John Does 1-20;4:22-cv-00395 and Bill Mathis |
| 4:2022cv00395 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joe Gresham. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Michel, Thomas) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint #1 filed by Joe Gresham. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice.Attorney Thomas M Michel added to party Joe Gresham(pty:dft) (Michel, Thomas) Modified on 6/8/2022 (sre). |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Linda Trice ; served on 5/12/2022. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sterling Trice ; served on 5/12/2022. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Gay Mathis ; served on 5/12/2022. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Bill Mathis ; served on 5/12/2022. (Schwartz, Richard) |
Filing 14
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Todd R. McFarland. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/12/2022) (chmb) (lcarm)
|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Joe Gresham ; served on 5/11/2022., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists re #9 Summons Issued, (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Todd R. McFarland (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12811879) filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 11 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint,,,,, by Plaintiff General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 10 Report to Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (bdb) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Joe Gresham, Bill Mathis, Gay Mathis, Linda Trice, Sterling Trice. (Attachments: # 1 Additional Page(s), # 2 Additional Page(s), # 3 Additional Page(s), # 4 Additional Page(s)) (jgg) (Main Document 9 replaced on 5/10/2022) (bdb). |
| Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12808749) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Schwartz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
