Lowe v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Darcy Lowe
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 4:2022cv00407
Filed: May 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Referring Judge: Hal R Ray
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration; served on 6/13/2022. (bdb) Modified docket text on 7/1/2022 (bdb). (Main Document 9 replaced on 7/1/2022) (bdb).
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 USM-285 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration Attorney General of the United States; served on 6/8/2022. (wxc)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration ; served on 6/1/2022. (npk)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Summons and USM 285 forms hand-delivered to USMS). (sre)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed on May 11, 2022. ECF No. #3 . After reviewing the pleading, attachments, and applicable legal authorities, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. The clerk shall file Plaintiff's pleadings without prepayment of costs or security therefor. It is therefore ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the UnitedStates Marshals Service shall serve process on the following Defendants: 1. by registered or certified mail to the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, addressed to the Civil Process Clerk in the United States Attorney's Office or to such person as may be designated in writing by the United States Attorney, Fed. R. Civ. P 4(i)(1)(A); 2. by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States of America, Fed R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(B); and 3. by registered or certified mail to any Defendant who is an officer or agency of the United States, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(C) and 4(i)(2). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 5/13/2022) (sre)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (jgg)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darcy Lowe (Heeps, Jonathan)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Darcy Lowe. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Heeps, Jonathan)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi filed by Darcy Lowe. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Heeps, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lowe v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darcy Lowe
Represented By: Jonathan Alexander Heeps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?