Scott v. The People of the City of Fort Worth
| Charles Edward Scott |
| The People of the City of Fort Worth |
| 4:2022cv00553 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Hal R Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mail returned as undeliverable. #9 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Charles Edward Scott, #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Edward Scott. Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr no longer assigned to case. received back from Charles Edward Scott as Return to Sender Unclaimed Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. Chambers is advised of USPS-provided forwarding address via this docket text. Current document not re-mailed (chambers to request update of docket and/or re-mailing if appropriate). (jgg) |
Filing 11
FINAL JUDGMENT This Judgment is issued pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment, together with a true copy of the Order accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/15/2022) (jgg)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The District Judge reviewed the proposed #9 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/15/2022) (jgg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10,11. Mon Aug 15 11:43:14 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Mon Aug 1 08:47:25 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 9
Findings and Recommendations: Scott failed to comply with prior court orders despite being warned noncompliance could lead to a recommendation that his case be dismissed without further warning. But his noncompliance does not appear to stem from purposeful delay or contumaciousness and the Court has not employed any lesser sanctions in this case. For these reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Judge OConnor DISMISS this case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 7/29/2022) (fba)
|
| Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #7 Order And Notice of Deficiency,, #4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party, #3 O' Connor (FORT WORTH CASES),,, received back from Charles Edward Scott as Return to Sender, Unclaimed, Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (sre) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Charles Edward Scott must address the following deficiency: he did sign and date the application. Nor did he complete any of the sections of the form, instead drawing lines through several sections and writing 0 across several areas of the form.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 7/14/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 6/30/2022) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Jun 30 15:52:22 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Wed Jun 29 08:30:37 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Charles Edward Scott (mmw) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Charles Edward Scott. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mmw) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: STALR. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Edward Scott (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The People of the City of Fort Worth filed by Charles Edward Scott. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/29/2022) (mmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. The People of the City of Fort Worth | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Edward Scott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The People of the City of Fort Worth | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
