Agamerica Avi, LLC v. Brazos Valley, LLC et al
Agamerica Avi, LLC |
Brazos Valley, LLC, Debra Carter, Crockett Carter, Justin Hasty and Shelly Rounds |
4:2022cv00560 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS:It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion #15 is GRANTED in its entirety. It is further ORDERED that the Court's August I 8, 2022 Order #13 is STRICKEN. Plaintiff, AgAmerica A VI, LLC, is ORDERED to seek entry of default from the Clerk of Court and file a motion for default judgment against Defendants Brazos Valley, LLC, Debra Carter, Crockett Carter, and Shelly Rounds, solely in her capacity as the Executrix of the Estate of Andrew B. Jackson on or before 9/6/2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/23/2022) (jgg) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Beau Gould on behalf of Agamerica Avi, LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Gould, Beau) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Agamerica Avi, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order) (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 14 Combined Request for Clerks Entry of Default and MOTION for Default Judgment against Justin Hasty filed by Agamerica Avi, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Clerk's Entry of Default, #2 Declaration(s) Thomas C. Scannell) (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 13 ***STRICKEN AND UNFILED*** ORDER: On June 30, 2022, Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit. ECF No. #1 . From July 7 to July 18, proofs of service as to each defendant were filed. ECF Nos. #5 #9 . Over 21 days have passed since the last of the Defendants were served, and, as of the date of this Order, they have not filed an answer or otherwise properly responded to Plaintiff's Complaint. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to seek entry of default from the Clerk of this Court and to file a motion for default judgment against Defendants on or before August 25, 2022. Otherwise, the Court may dismiss Plaintiff's action against these Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. See FED. R. CIV. P.41(b); see also Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/18/2022) (sre) |
Filing 12 ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT(S): The motions for Extension of Time #10 and #11 are unfiled. The motion or response must include certificate of conference or inability to confer. See LR 7.1(b) or LCrR 47.1(b) and a proposed order. See LR 7.1(c) or LCrR 47.1(c). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/3/2022) (sre) |
Filing 11 ***STRICKEN AND UNFILED PER #12 ORDER*** Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Debra Carter. (sre) Modified on 8/3/2022 (sre). |
Filing 10 ***STRICKEN AND UNFILED PER #12 ORDER*** Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Crockett Carter. (sre) Modified on 8/3/2022 (sre). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Crockett Carter ; served on 7/12/2022. (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Brazos Valley, LLC ; served on 7/12/2022. (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Debra Carter ; served on 7/12/2022. (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Shelly Rounds ; served on 7/5/2022. (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Justin Hasty ; served on 7/6/2022. (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Brazos Valley, LLC, Crockett Carter, Debra Carter, Justin Hasty, Shelly Rounds. (jgg) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AGAMERICA AVI, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Scannell, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brazos Valley, LLC filed by AGAMERICA AVI, LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12933009) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D, #6 Exhibit(s) E, #7 Exhibit(s) F, #8 Exhibit(s) G, #9 Exhibit(s) H, #10 Exhibit(s) I, #11 Exhibit(s) J) (Scannell, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.