Hardin v. Punj-Aab Trucking, Inc. et al
| Amanda Hardin |
| Punj-Aab Trucking, Inc., Kumar Sushil and Forward Air Inc |
| 4:2022cv00571 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Western District of Oklahoma as case number 5:22-cv-587. (jgg) |
Filing 5
Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Division of Western District of Oklahoma. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/12/2022) (wxc)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division JOINT BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO THIS HONORABLE COURTS ORDER (ECF NO. 3) AND JOINT MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE filed by Punj-Aab Trucking, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ford, Matthew) |
| Interdistrict Transfer to Western District of Oklahoma; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Western District of Oklahoma. (wxc) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's Notice of Removal. ECF No. #1 . After reviewing the Notice and related filings, it appears that this case has no relation to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. The Court therefore ORDERS the Parties to file a Joint Report of no more than eight pages by July 14, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. explaining whether the Court should transfer this case to the Western Division of Oklahoma or the Amarillo Division of the Western Division of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/7/2022) (sre) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/8/2022) (bdb).
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Punj-Aab Trucking, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12939527) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) State Court Index and File, #4 Exhibit(s) Ds' COIP, #5 Exhibit(s) Notice of Related Case) (Ford, Matthew) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Punj-Aab Trucking, Inc., Kumar Sushil. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF) (See doc #1 for image). (jgg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
