Stone Strong, LLC v. Worthington National Bank
Stone Strong, LLC |
Worthington National Bank |
4:2022cv00619 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Contract: Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Dismissal Without Prejudice re: #5 Writ Issued, #3 Writ Issued, #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment,,,,, filed by Stone Strong, LLC (Holleman, Michael) |
Filing 8 Return of Writ of Garnishment as to Worthington National Bank Returned Executed on 08/04/2022. (Snyder, William) Modified docket text on 9/1/2022 (wxc). |
![]() |
Filing 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-13009556) filed by Stone Strong, LLC Attorney Sheila A Bentzen added to party Stone Strong, LLC(pty:pla) (Bentzen, Sheila) |
Filing 5 Amended Writ of Garnishment Issued as to Worthington National Bank. (mmw) |
Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Stone Strong, LLC. Amendment to #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment,,,,,. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Amended Writ of Garnishment) (Snyder, William) |
Filing 3 Writ of Garnishment Issued as to Worthington National Bank. (sre) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Stone Strong, LLC (Snyder, William) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment filed by Stone Strong, LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12971232) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Affidavit of Sheila A. Bentzen, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Judgment Registered with this Court, Case No. 3:22-mc-00053-M, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Writ of Garnishment, #4 Proposed Order Granting Application for Writ of Garnishment) (Snyder, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stone Strong, LLC v. Worthington National Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stone Strong, LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael Boyce Holleman, II |
Represented By: | William S Snyder |
Represented By: | Sheila A Bentzen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Garnishee: Worthington National Bank | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.