Regalado v. Management & Training Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Rogelio Regalado
Defendant: Management & Training Corporation, Grady Wallace and Jane Doe; 4:22-cv-643
Case Number: 4:2022cv00643
Filed: July 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Filing 9 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal,,,, by Defendants Management & Training Corporation, Grady Wallace. (Edwards, Allison)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Management & Training Corporation, Grady Wallace must address the following deficiency: Defendants' removal is deficient because they have not fully complied with Local Rule 81.1, which requires removing parties to file a copy of the docket sheet in the state-court action and each document filed in it. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 9/30/2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/16/2022) (bdb)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court therefore DIRECTS the clerk of Court to rescind its referral of this case to Judge Cureton. The undersigned will adjudicate the merits of this action in due course. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/16/2022) (bdb)
September 16, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Sep 16 16:02:10 CDT 2022 (crt)
September 16, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Sep 16 16:07:16 CDT 2022 (crt)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 Request for Leave to Amend filed by Rogelio Regalado. (fba)
September 15, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Rogelio Regalado, TDCJ No. 02315237. New address: Estelle Unit, 264 FM 3478, Huntsville, TX 77320. (fba)
July 28, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Thu Jul 28 10:45:11 CDT 2022 (crt)
July 27, 2022 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jgg)
July 27, 2022 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg)
July 27, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Management & Training Corporation, Grady Wallace. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Edwards, Allison)
July 27, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Grady Wallace, Management & Training Corporation. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12990960) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement, #5 Exhibit(s) E) (Edwards, Allison)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regalado v. Management & Training Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rogelio Regalado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Management & Training Corporation
Represented By: Allison R Edwards
Represented By: Mark Ryan Lankford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grady Wallace
Represented By: Allison R Edwards
Represented By: Mark Ryan Lankford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe; 4:22-cv-643
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?