Scott v. The City of Fort Worth et al
| Charles Edward Scott |
| The City of Fort Worth and The City of Dallas |
| 4:2022cv00675 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Hal R Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FINAL JUDGMENT: This Judgment is issued pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/16/2022) (tjc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ACCEPTING #9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/16/2022) (tjc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10, 11. Clerk mailed a true copy of this Judgment, together with a true copy of the Order accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Charles Scott Fri Sep 16 09:21:49 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Mon Aug 29 08:30:12 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 9
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED for lack of prosecution, without prejudice to being refiled. Each party to this action has the right to serve and file specific written objections in the United States District Court to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after the party has been served with a copy of this document. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 8/26/2022) (bdb)
|
| Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #6 Order And Notice of Deficiency received back from Charles Edward Scott as Return to Sender - Unclaimed - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (bdb) |
| Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. #5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Charles Edward Scott as Returned to Sender - Unclaimed - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (tjc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Charles Edward Scott must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff shall either pay the total filing and administrative fees of $402.00 or fully complete all sections of the long-form application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 8/23/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 8/9/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP Form) (bdb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Aug 9 15:01:52 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mon Aug 8 16:49:38 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate No magistrate judge assigned preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (bdb) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Charles Edward Scott. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (bdb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Edward Scott. (bdb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The City of Dallas, The City of Fort Worth filed by Charles Edward Scott. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
