Malson v. MidFirst Bank
| Steven Malson |
| MidFirst Bank |
| 4:2022cv00706 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Terry R Means |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Final JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order issued on this same day and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All costs of Court under 28 U.S.C. 1920 shall be borne by the party incurring same. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 8/26/2022). (fba)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: In accordance with the stipulation, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and each party shall bear its own costs per the stipulation. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 8/26/2022). (fba)
|
| Filing 3 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by MidFirst Bank. (Hopkins, Shelley) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MidFirst Bank. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). see #1 - 6 for image (mmw) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by MidFirst Bank. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-13039077) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement, #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s)) (Hopkins, Shelley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malson v. MidFirst Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Malson | |
| Represented By: | James Minerve |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MidFirst Bank | |
| Represented By: | Shelley L Hopkins |
| Represented By: | Robert Davis Forster, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
