Vinayak, LLC; Motel 6 v. Penn-America Insurance Company
| Vinayak, LLC; Motel 6 |
| Penn-America Insurance Company |
| ADR Provider |
| 4:2022cv00771 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Defendant Penn-America Insurance Company's Rule 26 Initial Disclosures filed by Penn-America Insurance Company (Wood, D) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning June 12, 2023. Joinder of Parties due by 12/2/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 12/2/2022. Motions due by 2/13/2023. Deadline for mediation is on or before 12/15/2022. Discovery due by 1/13/2023. Pretrial Order due by 5/18/2023. The court appoints Donald E Herrmann as mediator. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/4/2022) (mmw)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Penn-America Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Wood, D) |
| Filing 6 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order Joint Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order by Vinayak, LLC; Motel 6. (Kendall, William) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Penn-America Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Wood, D) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Vinayak, LLC; Motel 6. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Kendall, William) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before September 27, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/30/2022) (mmw)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Penn-America Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-13073136) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit(s) Index, #4 Exhibit(s) Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit(s) Petition and Citation, #6 Exhibit(s) Original Answer) (Wood, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
