Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. One Love Natural Mystic LLC et al
Joe Hand Promotions Inc |
One Love Natural Mystic LLC, Tonya Marie Lane, Rajendra Kissoon, One Love Lounge, One Love Lounge Caribbean Restaurant, Tonya Marie Williams-Lane and Billy Kissoon |
4:2022cv00807 |
September 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Other Statutes: Cable/Satellite TV |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executedas to Tonya Marie Lane a/k/a Tony Marie Williams-Lane; served on 11/1/22 (King, Jamie) Modified on 11/8/2022 (mmw). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Tonya Marie Lane ; served on 11/1/2022. (King, Jamie) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to One Love Natural Mystic LLC ; served on 11/1/2022. (King, Jamie) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel (ECF No #5 ). Counsel for Plaintiff is admitted to the Northern District of Texas but is located in Houston, Texas. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds good cause to permit Plaintiff's counsel to proceed without local counsel; however, per Local Rule 7.1, Ms. King must certify her conference with counsel for Defendants regarding the matter. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs counsel to supplement or refile her Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel after conferring with opposing counsel and certifying th e same. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/26/2022) (tjc) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (King, Jamie) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rajendra Kissoon, Tonya Marie Lane, One Love Natural Mystic LLC. (mmw) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (King, Jamie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rajendra Kissoon, Tonya Marie Lane, One Love Natural Mystic LLC filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13133874) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (King, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.