Stringer v. Lopez
| Johnnie Raye Stringer |
| Warden John Lopez |
| 4:2022cv00811 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Acknowledgment of Electronic Service of #1 Petition, #4 Order, and #5 Order by Laura Haney (mmw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: Respondent shall file an answer to this petition within 60 days of this order. The clerk will electronically serve this order, the petition, and supporting documents to the designee for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/1/2022) (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Nov 1 16:14:15 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: If Stringer intends to proceed with this habeas action, he must either (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee; or (2) file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement by October 17, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/15/2022) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Sep 15 14:42:42 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw)
|
|
Filing 2
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: STALR. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Johnnie Raye Stringer. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Tue Sep 13 14:25:17 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stringer v. Lopez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Johnnie Raye Stringer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden John Lopez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
