Melton v. Bell Textron Inc
Plaintiff: Linzee Melton
Defendant: Bell Textron Inc
Case Number: 4:2022cv00823
Filed: September 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Terry R Means
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Bell Textron Inc re: #5 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) (Harris, Sara)
October 14, 2022 Filing 7 Appendix in Support filed by Linzee Melton re #6 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Remand (Smith, Jason)
October 14, 2022 Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Linzee Melton re #5 MOTION to Remand (Smith, Jason)
October 14, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Remand filed by Linzee Melton (Smith, Jason)
September 16, 2022 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdb)
September 16, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bell Textron Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Rutherford, Jay)
September 16, 2022 Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal,,,,, by Defendant Bell Textron Inc. (Rutherford, Jay)
September 16, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Bell Textron Inc. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13152180) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1A, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1B, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1C, #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1D, #6 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1E, #7 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1F, #8 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1G, #9 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1H, #10 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 2, #11 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 3, #12 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 4, #13 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 4A, #14 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 4B) (Rutherford, Jay)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melton v. Bell Textron Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linzee Melton
Represented By: Jason C N Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bell Textron Inc
Represented By: Jay K Rutherford
Represented By: Sara Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?