Osborne v. Warden Smith
| Rikki A. Osborne |
| Warden Smith |
| 4:2022cv00863 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the petition and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/21/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Nov 21 15:47:28 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Untitled document filed by Rikki A. Osborne (Attachments: #1 Clerks Response) (jgg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: If Osborne intends to proceed with this habeas action, he must either pay the $5 filing fee or file a completed IFP application, accompanied by a certificate of inmate trust account,1 by October 26, 2022. If Osborne fails to comply with this order, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice for failure to prosecute. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/27/2022) (jgg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. IFP application mailed Tue Sep 27 14:11:29 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jgg) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rikki A. Osborne. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jgg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Mon Sep 26 14:49:14 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Osborne v. Warden Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rikki A. Osborne | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden Smith | |
| Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
