Byrd Group LLC et al v. American Precision Ammunition, LLC et al
Fore Those Who Serve, LLC and Fore Those Who Serve LLC |
American Precision Ammunition, LLC and Matthew Campbell |
Byrd Group LLC |
ADR Provider |
4:2022cv00960 |
October 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Courts four-week docket beginning Monday, November 20, 2023 in US Courthouse, Courtroom 4th Floor, 501 W. 10th St. Fort Worth, TX 76102-3673 before Judge Mark Pittman., Joinder of Parties due by 2/7/2023., Amended Pleadings due by 2/7/2023., Deadline for mediation is on or before 5/24/2023., Discovery due by 6/23/2023., Motions due by 7/24/2023., Pretrial Order due by 10/26/2023., ADR Provider, Len Wade, added. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/9/2022) (sre) |
Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Byrd Group LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by Byrd Group LLC. Related document: #10 Answer to Complaint,,,,, Counterclaim,,,, Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 13 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Fore Those Who Serve LLC. (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 12 ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before November 29, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/14/2022) (sre) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Precision Ammunition, LLC, Matthew Campbell. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Beshara, Lance) |
Filing 10 Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,, with Jury Demand filed by Matthew Campbell, American Precision Ammunition, LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice., COUNTERCLAIM against Matthew Campbell, Byrd Group LLC filed by Matthew Campbell, American Precision Ammunition, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B)Attorney Lance H Beshara added to party American Precision Ammunition, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Lance H Beshara added to party Matthew Campbell(pty:dft) (Beshara, Lance) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to American Precision Ammunition, LLC and Matthew Campbell on 10/29/2022. (DuBose, Eugene) Modified on 11/8/2022 (sre). |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to American Precision Ammunition, LLC, Matthew Campbell. (sre) |
Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Byrd Group LLC, Fore Those Who Serve, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Signed Civil Cover Sheet re: #4 Notice (Other) filed by Byrd Group LLC, Fore Those Who Serve, LLC (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Civil Cover Sheet filed by Byrd Group LLC, Fore Those Who Serve, LLC (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Byrd Group LLC (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Fore Those Who Serve, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (DuBose, Eugene) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Byrd Group LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13250080) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (DuBose, Eugene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.