Clayton v. Amazon
Plaintiff: JacQuetta L. Clayton
Defendant: Amazon
Case Number: 4:2022cv00984
Filed: November 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Cureton
Referring Judge: Reed C O'Connor
2 Judge: Mark Pittman
3 Judge: Hal R Ray
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Mon Nov 21 08:38:52 CST 2022 (crt)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as Plaintiff has already paid the filling fee. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 11/18/2022) (chmb)
November 15, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JacQuetta L. Clayton (jgg)
November 14, 2022 Filing 9 Civil Case Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff JacQuetta L. Clayton. (jgg)
November 3, 2022 Filing 8 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bcr)
November 3, 2022 Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bcr)
November 3, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7,8. Thu Nov 3 08:43:56 CDT 2022 (crt)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order and Notice of Deficiency: JacQuetta L. Clayton must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has not paid the applicable filing and administrative fee nor has she filed a long-form application to proceed in forma pauperis. In order for the Court to make the determination regarding any pauper application, Plaintiff must provide complete and accurate answers to all of the questions in the long-form in-forma-pauperis application, including information about all of his income, employment, banking deposits, assets and expenses, any spousal income, and whether the applicant has any and the number of dependents Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 11/16/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 11/2/2022) (jgg)
November 2, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. IFP Application Wed Nov 2 09:46:02 CDT 2022 (crt)
November 1, 2022 Filing 6 Court Request for Recusal: Judge Reed C. O'Connor recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Judge Mark Pittman and Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 4:22-cv-00984-P-BJ. (bcr)
November 1, 2022 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jgg)
November 1, 2022 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg)
November 1, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JacQuetta L. Clayton. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (jgg)
November 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Amazon filed by JacQuetta L. Clayton. Civil Case Cover Sheet #9 Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jgg)
November 1, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Tue Nov 1 15:15:09 CDT 2022 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clayton v. Amazon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JacQuetta L. Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?