Lundahl v. Smith et al
| Holli Telford Lundahl |
| M. Smith, Merrick Garland, Collete Peters, Director of the Local FBI Office (Dallas TX) and Office of The Inspector General for US Postal Service |
| 4:2022cv01017 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Continuance of Time to Respond to the Court's Alleged Order and Notice of Deficiency for Good Cause to January 15, 2023, construed as a motion for extension of time to comply with the Court's prior Order and Notice of Deficiency (ECF No. #5 ), is GRANTED, such that Holli Tedford Lundahl shall have until January 17, 2023 to comply with the Order and Notice of Deficiency. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/27/2022) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Dec 27 10:52:45 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Motion for Continuance of Time to Respond to the Court's Alleged Order and Notice of Deficiency for Good Cause filed by Holli Telford Lundahl (wxc) |
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Holli Telford Lundahl must address the following deficiency: $5.00 filing fee has not been paid nor has a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis; A form 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief has not been completed and filed. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 12/19/2022. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/17/2022) (Attachments: #1 2241, #2 IFP) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Nov 17 16:32:46 CST 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Wed Nov 16 10:52:29 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Director of the Local FBI Office (Dallas TX), Merrick Garland, Office of The Inspector General for US Postal Service, Collete Peters, M. Smith filed by Holli Telford Lundahl. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Part 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Part 2) (wxc) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/16/2022) (bdb). (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/16/2022) (bdb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
