Hollis v. Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A.
| Drue A. Hollis, I |
| Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. |
| 4:2022cv01043 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
FINAL JUDGMENT This final judgment is issued pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 58(a). This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, it is ORDERED that this suit is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this judgment to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/12/2022) (jgg)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Having conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judges findings, the Court ADOPTS the reasoning in the Magistrate Judges FCRs #9 , #11 and OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections #13 , #14 . It is thus ORDERED that Plaintiff is declared a vexatious litigant and that: (1) monetary sanctions may be imposed for future vexatious litigation considered to be abusive and harassing in nature; and (2) he must obtain leave of court by filing a motion before he is permitted to file any additional complaints in this district. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/12/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 14 OBJECTION to #9 Findings and Recommendations Plaintiffs Objection to the Proposed Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge by Drue A. Hollis, I (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s)) (Hollis, Drue) |
| Filing 13 OBJECTION to #9 Findings and Recommendations Plaintiffs Supplemental Objection to Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge by Drue A. Hollis, I (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s)) (Hollis, Drue) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Drue Hollis Motion to Withdraw Funds from the Registry #3 . In his Motion, Hollis requests the United States District Clerk withdrawal twenty million dollars from the Court's Registry. On December 1,2022, pursuant to the screening provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), the Court issued its Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation of dismissal of all Hollis' claims against Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. Accordingly, the Court finds the instant Motion should be denied as moot. It is therefore ORDERED Hollis' Motion to Withdraw Funds from the Registry of the Court is DENIED AS MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 12/1/2022) (jgg)
|
|
Filing 11
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DISMISSING CLAIMS PURSUANT TO SCREENING PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) It is RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), the above-styled and numbered cause be DISMISSED as Hollis, in his complaint, has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.Under 28 U.S.C. 636, it is hereby ORDERED that each party is granted until December 15,2022, to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. It is further ORDERED that if objections are filed and the opposing party chooses to file a response, the response shall be filed within seven (7) days of the filing date of the objections. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 12/1/2022) (jgg) (Main Document 11 replaced with a text searchable doc on 12/5/2022) (ali).
|
| Filing 10 OBJECTION filed by Drue A. Hollis, I re: #9 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #1 Complaint,, filed by Drue A. Hollis, I., #3 (Document Restricted) MOTION to Withdraw Funds from Court Registry (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s)) (Hollis, Drue) |
|
Filing 9
FINDING, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On November 23, 2022,pro se Plaintiff Drue Allen Hollis filed a Complaint #1 against Defendant Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. in the above-styled and referenced case. The undersigned FINDS that Hollis' litigation history has risen to the prevalence and level of harassment that existed in the cases cited above where sanctions were deemed appropriate.Based on the foregoing, the Court RECOMMENDS that Hollis is declared a vexatious litigant and that the District Court warn Hollis by order that (1) monetary sanctions may be imposed for future vexatious litigation considered to be abusive and harassing in nature, and (2) that Hollis must obtain leave to court by filing a motion before he is permitted to file any additional complaints in this district. Under 28 U.S.C. 636, it is hereby ORDERED that each party is granted until December 12, 2022, to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. It is further ORDERED that if objections are filed and the opposing party chooses to file a response, the response shall be filed within seven (7) days of the filing date of the objections. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 11/28/2022) (jgg) (Main Document 9 replaced with text searchable doc on 11/29/2022) (ali).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AUTHORIZING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS On November 23, 2022, Plaintiff, Drue Hollis, filed a civil complaint accompanied by an application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs #2 Having now reviewed Plaintiffs application, the undersigned has determined that Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in f01ma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(l). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 11/28/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. filed by Drue A. Hollis, I. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Hollis, Drue) |
| Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jgg) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (jgg) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Drue A. Hollis, I. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (jgg) |
| Filing 3 (Document Restricted) MOTION to Withdraw Funds from Court Registry filed by Drue A. Hollis, I (jgg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Drue A. Hollis, I (jgg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. filed by Drue A. Hollis, I. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jgg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hollis v. Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Drue A. Hollis, I | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eyes on Camp Bowie, P.A. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
