Michelle Martinez v. Johnson County Special Utility District
Michelle Martinez |
Johnson County Special Utility District |
4:2022cv01076 |
December 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Civil Rights: Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 754 Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Order: The Fort Worth Division is an improper venue for this case since the alleged events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in Johnson County, Texas. ECF No. #1 . Therefore, the Court finds it appropriate to transfer this case to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. The above-styled case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/6/2022) (fba) |
Case copied to 3:22cv2731-L. Transfer to Dallas Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (twd) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (fba) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michelle Martinez. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Jenkins, Christian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Michelle Martinez. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13346547) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Jenkins, Christian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michelle Martinez v. Johnson County Special Utility District | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michelle Martinez | |
Represented By: | Christian Jenkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Johnson County Special Utility District | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.