Lewis v. Spinnaker Insurance Company
Russell Lewis |
Spinnaker Insurance Company |
ADR Provider |
4:2022cv01093 |
December 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 5/1/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 5/1/2023. Motions due by 11/20/2023. Deadline for mediation is on or before 6/30/2023. Discovery due by 10/20/2023. Pretrial Order due by 2/22/2024. Bench Trial set for 3/18/2024 08:30 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 2nd Floor, 501 W. 10th St. Fort Worth, TX 76102-3673 before Judge Reed C. O'Connor. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/6/2023) (jgg) |
Filing 6 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order by Spinnaker Insurance Company. (Hudgins, Michael) |
Filing 5 ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel #4 , filed December 16, 2022. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that Plaintiffs counsel abide by all local rules of this Court, including the standards of litigation conduct set forth in Dondi Properties Corporation v. Commerce Savings & Loan Association, 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988) (per curiam). It is further ORDERED that if proceeding without local counsel disrupts this litigation or otherwise results in a failure to comply with the rules of this Court, Plaintiff will be required to obtain local counsel immediately. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/19/2022) (jgg) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Russell Lewis (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Crowell, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before January 5, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/9/2022) (sre) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Spinnaker Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13358228) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Cover Sheet, #8 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Hudgins, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.