Dingler v. Tarrant Co Sheriff et al
| Joseph Dingler |
| Tarrant Co Sheriff, Tarrant Co District 432nd Court, Tarrant Co 396th Court and Bill Waybourn |
| 4:2022cv01156 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order issued this same day and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/14/2023). (fba)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: It is therefore ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/14/2023) (fba)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Tue Feb 14 09:52:16 CST 2023 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Joseph Dingler must address the following deficiencies: The $5.00 filing fee for habeas petitions has not been paid nor has a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis and certificate of inmate trust account been submitted. A form 2241 petition for habeas relief has not been filed. It is ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure each aforementioned deficiencies within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the petition for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/5/2023) (fba)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. And A form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Certificate of Inmate Trust Account ; A form 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus Thu Jan 5 11:50:41 CST 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Fri Dec 30 09:29:41 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (fba) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (fba) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed without being taxed filed by Joseph Dingler. (fba) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Dingler. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (fba) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
