Marquez v. Smith
Misael Nunez Marquez |
Daniel B. Smith |
4:2023cv00026 |
January 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: It is ORDERED that the February 22, 2023 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #11 ) is DISMISSED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/23/2023) (fba) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Thu Feb 23 13:47:28 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Federal Filing Fee Analysis Report filed by Misael Nunez Marquez. (fba) |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF PRO SE NOTICE filed by Misael Nunez Marquez. (fba) |
Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING ADDRESS UPDATE FOR PLAINTIFF: It has come to the Court's attention, however, that copies of Court orders have been returned. ECF Nos. #6 and #7 . Those orders were a Notice and Instructions to Pro se Party (ECF No. #4 ) and Filing Fee Order (ECF No. #5 ). It appears these orders were sent to an address for the Tarrant County, Green Bay Jail facility. Tarrant County staff, however, has informed this Court's staff that all Tarrant County Jail inmate mail must be sent to the primary address 100 N. Lamar Street, Fort Worth, Texas76196. Thus, the Clerk of Court should so update the address of record on the docket for Plaintiff Marquez, and also re-mail to him copies of this order and the prior orders he did not receive. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/30/2023) (fba) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4,5,9. And a copy of Filing Fee Order #5 to: Inmate Accounting Tarrant County Jail 100 North Lamar Street Fort Worth, TX 76196 Mon Jan 30 16:06:05 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #5 Order For Partial Filing Fee, received back from Inmate Accounting Office as Return to Sender - Insufficient address - Unable to Forward. The current document has not been re-mailed. (fba) |
Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. #5 Order For Partial Filing Fee, received back from Misael Nunez Marquez as Return to Sender - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (fba) |
Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. #4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party, #3 O' Connor (FORT WORTH CASES),, received back from Misael Nunez Marquez as Return to Sender Not Deliverable as Addressed Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (fba) |
Filing 5 FILING FEE ORDER: Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 such that his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Partial Filing Fee in amount of $13.10 with a balance of $336.90 remaining. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/11/2023) (fba) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Wed Jan 11 09:39:07 CST 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. And Inmate Accounting Tarrant County Green Bay Facility 2500 Urban Drive Fort Worth, TX 76101 Wed Jan 11 14:58:00 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (tjc) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tjc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Misael Nunez Marquez. (tjc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel B. Smith filed by Misael Nunez Marquez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (tjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marquez v. Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Misael Nunez Marquez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Daniel B. Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.