Robinson et al v. Wells Fargo et al
| Denny L. Robinson, Gustavo Amaro, Angel Obregon, Byron J. Warren and Byron J Warren |
| Wells Fargo, Albert Yagubyan, Artashes Darbinyan, Orbel Hakobyan, Navy Federal Credit Union, Taimak Peters, Lyle Livesay, Adante Leshaun Dapree, Jack V. Smalley, David Tones, JP Morgan Chase, Enron Corp, Bank of America, Martiza Villarroel, Irma DeMartini and Jamal Braheem |
| 4:2023cv00042 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #7 #6 received back from Denny L. Robinson as Not Deliverable as Addressed. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (mmw) |
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: Consistent with the order of dismissal signed this date, the claims of Plaintiff, Denny L. Robinson, in this action are DISMISSED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/10/2023) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff has failed to comply with the order and has not taken any other steps to pursue this action. The Court finds that no lesser sanction than dismissal for failure to comply with the January 11 order would be appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/10/2023) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Fri Feb 10 15:19:40 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Mail returned as undeliverable. #2 #4 #3 received back from Denny L. Robinson as Insufficient Address. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (mmw) |
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Denny L. Robinson must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has not paid the applicable filing fee or sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 2/1/2023. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/12/2023) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (mmw)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: STSJ. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Denny L. Robinson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Jan 12 16:05:37 CST 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Thu Jan 12 11:03:53 CST 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
