Roy White v. Spenard et al
Plaintiff: Roy White
Defendant: Stephane Spenard and Normandin Transit, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2023cv00155
Filed: February 16, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William David Carson on behalf of Normandin Transit, Inc.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Carson, William)
March 23, 2023 Filing 15 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint,, filed by Normandin Transit, Inc.. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Sargent, David)
March 14, 2023 Filing 14 Plaintiff's Rule 26(A)(1) Initial Disclosures filed by Roy White (Mavani, Zohra) Modified docket text per DJ chambers on 4/3/2023 (bdb).
March 14, 2023 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Roy White. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Mavani, Zohra)
March 14, 2023 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Roy White. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Mavani, Zohra)
March 14, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zohra I Mavani on behalf of Roy White. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Mavani, Zohra)
March 10, 2023 Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Normandin Transit, Inc.. (Sargent, David)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) by March 15, 2023, Plaintiff file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigned's judge-specific requirements; and (2) within 14 days after Plaintiff files the amended complaint, but no later than March 29, 2023, Defendants file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. The Court further ORDERS that failure of any party to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of Plaintiff's claims or granting of a default judgment, as appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/1/2023) (fba)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order: Lead counsel for each party (or designee attorney with appropriate authority) and any unrepresented party (except for a prisoner litigant proceeding pro se) shall confer (the Scheduling Conference) in a face-to-face conference as soon as practicable. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before March 15, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/1/2023) (fba)
February 21, 2023 Filing 7 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Normandin Transit, Inc. re #4 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s)) (Sargent, David)
February 17, 2023 Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Normandin Transit, Inc.. (Sargent, David)
February 17, 2023 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand filed by Normandin Transit, Inc. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Sargent, David)
February 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court ORDERS the Parties to each file a brief-not to exceed 10 pages-on or before February 21, 2023, that explains whether diversity jurisdiction exists in this case. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions or remand of this case, without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/17/2023) (fba)
February 16, 2023 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (tjc)
February 16, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of Removal filed by Normandin Transit, Inc. (Sargent, David)
February 16, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Stephane Spenard, Normandin Transit, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13523055) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit(s) Index of Matters Being Filed, #3 Exhibit(s) Index of State Court File, #4 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Interested Persons, #5 Exhibit(s) Normandin's Corporate Disclosure Statement, #6 Cover Sheet Federal Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Federal Civil Cover Sheet) (Sargent, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roy White v. Spenard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy White
Represented By: Zohra I Mavani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephane Spenard
Represented By: David L Sargent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Normandin Transit, Inc.
Represented By: David L Sargent
Represented By: William David Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?