Hollis v. Tarrant County
| Drue A. Hollis, I and Drue A Hollis |
| Tarrant County |
| 4:2023cv00232 |
| March 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/4/2023) (mmw) (Main Document 11 replaced on 4/10/2023) (mmw).
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ACCEPTING #7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court therefore ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/4/2023) (mmw)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address for Drue A. Hollis, I. (mmw) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against Tarrant County filed by Drue A. Hollis, I. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
|
Filing 7
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is therefore RECOMMENDED that that all of Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED for failing to comply with the sanction order. Under 28 U.S.C. 636, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until March 21, 2023 to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/7/2023) (mmw)
|
| Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: STSJ. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (mmw) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by Drue A. Hollis, I. (Clerk declines to issue due to pending motion for IFP) (mmw) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Drue A. Hollis, I. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mmw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Drue A. Hollis, I (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tarrant County filed by Drue A. Hollis, I. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
