Wesley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Donna Wesley |
Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
4:2023cv00296 |
March 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jeffrey L Cureton |
Mark Pittman |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Administrative Record consisting of Social Security record filed by Commissioner, Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s)) (Poole, Eric) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Commissioner, Social Security Administration. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Poole, Eric) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Dale Poole on behalf of Commissioner, Social Security Administration. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Poole, Eric) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed on March 23, 2023. ECF No. #2 . After reviewing the pleading, attachments, and applicable legal authorities, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 3/27/2023) (fba) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (fba) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Waive Local Counsel Requirement filed by Donna Wesley (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo In Support) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Donna Wesley. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Donna Wesley (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Donna Wesley. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Complaint NEF sent to SSA OGC and to TXND USAO.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Case Referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (fba) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.