Brantley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Ross Thomas Brantley, III |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
4:2023cv00317 |
March 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that the #13 second motion for an extension of time is GRANTED such that the time to pay the $5.00 filing fee is extended until June 15, 2023. Failure to submit the required payment by June 15, 2023 could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/23/2023) (mmw) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File 2nd Extension of Time and Appointment of Counsel filed by Ross Thomas Brantley, III (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Tue May 23 14:47:30 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 ...It is therefore ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time is GRANTED such that the time to pay the $5.00 filing fee is extended until May 26, 2023. To the extent Brantley seeks other relief, the motion is DENIED. Failure to submit the required payment by May 26, 2023 could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/26/2023) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Wed Apr 26 10:37:45 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 11 Motion for Extension of Time filed by Ross Thomas Brantley, III (wxc) |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION AND ORDER TO PAY FILING FEE: It is therefore ORDERED that the #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that payment of the $5.00 fee to file an application for writ of habeas corpus be submitted to the clerk of Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 4/4/2023) (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Tue Apr 4 16:54:20 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 9 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc) |
Filing 7 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 3:23-cv-00097. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Fri Mar 31 09:34:00 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to USDC NDTX - Fort Worth Division (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(agould, 3) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/31/2023.] |
Filing 5 Interdistrict transfer to USDC Northern District of Texas - Fort Worth Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 3/29/2023, filed. (agould, 3) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/31/2023.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (CynthiaBenavides, 3) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/31/2023.] |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ross Thomas Brantley, filed. (CynthiaBenavides, 3) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/31/2023.] |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ross Thomas Brantley, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/17/2023. (CynthiaBenavides, 3) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/31/2023.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Ross Thomas Brantley. (Attachments: #1Attachments, #2 Envelope)(CynthiaBenavides, 3) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/31/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brantley v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ross Thomas Brantley, III | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Represented By: | Edward L Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.