Akbarzadeh v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Soudabeh Akbarzadeh and Roksana Jahanafrooz |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of State, EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES, Yerevan, Armenia, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Ur Jaddou, Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Antony J. Blinken, Rafik Mansour, Department of Homeland Security, The Los Angeles Asylum Office, Does 1-50, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and Antony J Blinken |
| 4:2023cv00541 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Hal R Ray |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of re: #9 Order, filed by Soudabeh Akbarzadeh (Meshki, Cyrus) |
Filing 9
ORDER: On or before July 12, 2023, Ms. Roohbakhsh and Mr. Meshki shall apply to proceed pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff, or otherwise comply with Local Civil Rule 83.9(a). Also by that time, they shall seek leave of court to proceed without local counsel or shall designate such counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 7/5/2023) (mmw)
|
| Filing 8 Summons issued as to Antony J Blinken, Embassy of the United States, Yerevan, Armenia, Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Rafik Mansour, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of State, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (saw) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Soudabeh Akbarzadeh. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). See ECF no. #6 (saw) |
| Filing 6 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Roksana Jahanafrooz. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Meshki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Roksana Jahanafrooz. (One or more defendant(s) is no longer named.) Clerk to issue summons(es) for new federal defendant(s). Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Meshki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Department of Homeland Security, The Los Angeles Asylum Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (saw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1), with any appeal therefrom taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(3). Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr for all further proceedings. Judge Mark Pittman no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/1/2023) (saw)
|
| New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the national and circuit indexes.) Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (saw) |
| Filing 2 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Soudabeh Akbarzadeh. Request for summons. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet) (Meshki, Cyrus) Modified docket text on 6/1/2023 (saw). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Soudabeh Akbarzadeh. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number CTXNDC-13779236) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Meshki, Cyrus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
