Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
| Noelia Giselle Rodriguez |
| United States of America, Officer FNU Curiel, FMC-C Management Team, The Special Investigative Services Unit, The Office of Internal Affairs, The Office of Inspector General and U.S. Department of Justice |
| 4:2023cv00589 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States of America. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 Appendix in Support filed by United States of America re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by United States of America with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Delaney-DOJ added to party United States of America(pty:dft) (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to United States of America. Waiver sent on 6/14/2023. (Drake, Christy) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to U.S. Department of Justice. Waiver sent on 5/16/2022. (Drake, Christy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case see Maria Cardenas v. United States of America, 4:23-cv-745-P re: #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Noelia Giselle Rodriguez (Drake, Christy) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to FNU Curiel, FMC-C Management Team, The Office of Inspector General, The Office of Internal Affairs, The Special Investigative Services Unit, U.S. Department of Justice, United States of America, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (sre) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Noelia Giselle Rodriguez. (See doc #1 for document). (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (sre) Modified on 6/12/2023 (sre). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Noelia Giselle Rodriguez. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13807327) Clerk to issue summons(es) for federal defendant(s). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 certificate of interested parties) (Webster, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
